Tag Archives: supreme court

RM181: Lifetime Placement on Sex Offender Registry Unconstitutional: SC Supreme Court Rules

On tonight’s program, we have a landmark case out of South Carolina that we’re going to talk about dealing with PFRs and the constitutionality of the registry. We have a lead in case we’re going to talk about the Armed Career Crime Act or ACCA. We’re going to talk about a Supreme Court decision. We’ve got a prisoner contribution. We’ve got a NARSOL member contribution from the website. And I think we’ve got a patron question, and we’ve got all sorts of good things. We’re gonna be here trying to jam pack all this into a one-hour podcast!

[1:47] Can the international Megan’s Law be valid? Shouldn’t something like that go through the treaty process?

[7:02] Would the mass media crucify right leaning politicians making improvements to the lives of PFRs?

[14:37] Transcript listener comment on the reliability of the podcast

[19:24] Lifetime Placement on Sex Offender Registry Unconstitutional: SC Supreme Court Rules

 

Read The Transcript RM181: Lifetime Placement on Sex Offender Registry Unconstitutional: SC Supreme Court Rules
https://www.registrymatters.co/transcript-rm181-lifetime-placement-on-sex-offender-registry-unconstitutional-sc-supreme-court-rules/

 

https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm181-lifetime-placement-on-sex-offender-registry-unconstitutional-sc-supreme-court-rules/
Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RegistryMatters
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/ypXjEedBkj
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
Apple Podcasts: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/registry-matters/id1305039280
Google Play Music: https://play.google.com/music/listen?u=0#/ps/Icuxbpzvyti7wtoredipbtiojqy
RSS: https://www.registrymatters.co/feed/podcast/
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3d75P7Kc37n2l79m89F9KI
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/registrymatters

RM109: Is There A Double Standard In Allegations

Read the transcript of RM109: Is There A Double Standard In Allegations here

Happy New Year from FYP Studios! This episode tackles the concept of reputation effect of Pennsylvania brought up by a listener. We are waiting for a supreme court decision out of Pennsylvania before we do a full on deep dive. Then we move over to a he-said-she-said and what appears to be an inconsistent standard. I’ll let you be the judge if it’s consistent or not. We also talk about Arkansas seriously limiting where registrants can live. Law enforcement claims it’s hard to track them if they’re homeless. Over in Wisconsin, giving officials your internet identifiers (email, etc) is NOT a violation of your first amendment. Because you have 10 days to do it. Giving you the ability to remain anonymous for that time. Tennessee is poised to become another state that mandates chemical castration for certain offenders. And finally closing out the show with a question regarding the conflict from two circuits on how much Internet freedom one has while on supervision.

[ ] Listener question from Stephen about reputation stuff in PA

[17:30] https://www.krqe.com/news/albuquerque-metro/man-accusing-governor-of-sexual-abuse-speaks-out/
https://www.krqe.com/news/albuquerque-metro/governors-office-responds-to-sexual-assault-allegations/
https://www.abqjournal.com/1094464/lujan-grisham-tells-senate-leader-to-leave-race.html

[29:30] https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2019/dec/29/sex-offender-housing-laws-raise-hitch-2/

[40:56] http://www.wisconsinappeals.net/on-point-by-the-wisconsin-state-public-defender/coa-requiring-internet-identifiers-of-sex-offender-registrants-doesnt-violate-first-amendment/

[53:48] https://fox17.com/news/local/tennessee-legislation-would-require-certain-sex-offenders-to-undergo-chemical-castration
https://www.khou.com/article/news/nation-world/tennessee-considering-chemical-castration-bill/285-ccaefe7a-f191-44cb-939b-362a9a9dcfc2

[59:30] An email from rick:
Have you heard about the very recent 10th Circuit decision US v Michael Blair? It seems to greatly contradict the 8th Circuit decision in US v Kevin Carson regarding internet use and other blanket probation restrictions. I would love to hear about it on a Registry Matters podcast. Thanks for all you do!

We record the show live usually on Saturday nights at 7pm Eastern. You can join the discord server and listen live.

But if you can’t listen live, you can always do in on-demand; which is the whole point anyway – to listen on demand. We want to make this available to you at your convenience. If you would do me a favor and subscribe. This is doing yourself a favor to subscribe in your favorite podcast application Apple or Google or Stitcher slacker pocket casts overcast, whatever, you know, even YouTube by subscribing you do two things:  one you make sure you’ll get that episode the minute we posted it’ll come right down onto your device so you can have it plenty of time for your Tuesday morning commute, but you also send a signal to those apps. Hey, people listen to this show and it will help other people discover it as well

https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm109-is-there-a-double-standard-in-allegations

Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477

Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com

Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters

Follow us on Twitter: Twitter

Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/DAmupkf

Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters

iTunes, Google Play Music, RSS, Spotify, YouTube

RM66: Court Provides New Tool To Challenge Registration

On Episode 66 of Registry Matters, we cover a couple listener questions; New York Supreme Court says you can’t put someone on Sex Offender supervision for a non-sexual offense; Concrete thrown through window day after police detail removed; We have a double standard between sexes in sexual offenses; Democrats extend statute of limitations in New York leading to a big uptick in attorney shopping; SCOTUS oral arguments lead to speculation regarding cases involving registrants;  Sex trafficking (not really) in Florida; Vets with Tier III offenses forfeit their right of military burial; Man in Boone, Iowa is allowed on school property – but other parents don’t want him there; SCOTUS expands precedent on ineffective counsel; Compliance checks with a full on police force and camera crew – are you sure this is a civil regulatory scheme; Media outlet fearmongering on California bill; 3rd Circuit provides a new vehicle to get into court for relief (Great news!)

http://art19.com/shows/today-explained/episodes/1d31e5a8-440a-4528-b554-4df534cd210c

[24:25] http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_01267.htm

[30:10] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/police-monitoring-of-sex-offenders-home-cost-nearly-dollar103000/ar-BBTW4BT

[32:50] https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/southwest-valley/2019/02/27/brittany-zamora-public-records-detail-goodyear-teacher-sexual-assault-allegations-student/2980023002/

[40:24] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/basketball_nba/law-would-ban-sex-offenders-from-some-multi-unit-buildings-houses-in-maine/ar-BBU3y5v?ocid=st

[43:25] https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2019/02/25/ny-law-firms-taking-more-child-sex-abuse-cases-in-wake-of-new-laws-enactment/

[52:20] https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/02/argument-analysis-court-poised-to-rule-for-challenger-in-dispute-over-constitutionality-of-sex-offender-law/
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/02/gorsuch-sotomayor-jury-trial-haymond.html

[1:01:50] https://reason.com/blog/2019/02/25/florida-massage-parlor-sex-stings
[source] https://reason.com/archives/2015/09/30/the-war-on-sex-trafficking-is

[1:06:15] https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/02/25/2019-03078/prohibition-of-interment-or-memorialization-of-persons-who-have-been-convicted-of-federal-or-state

[1:08:40] https://www.weareiowa.com/news/local-news/registered-sex-offender-allowed-in-boone-schools/1815220566

[1:12:00] https://www.courthousenews.com/supreme-court-expands-precedent-on-ineffective-counsel/
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/garza.pdf

[1:15:40] https://narsol.org/2019/03/routine-compliance-checks-are-anything-but/

[1:20:20] https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ca-democrats-lgbtq-bill-pedophiles/
[source] https://web.archive.org/web/20190223185752/https://thewashingtonpundit.com/2019/02/21/ca-democrats-introduce-lgbtq-bill-that-would-protect-pedophiles-who-rape-children/

[1:22:05] https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Third-Circuit_2019_Habeas.pdf

Share the podcast with those you know so that we can continue to grow our audience! We continue to receive a lot of positive feedback. Help us grow!
https://www.Registrymatters.co/podcast/rm66-court-provides-new-tool-to-challenge-registration
747-227-4477
registrymatterscast@gmail.com
https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Discord server? https://discord.gg/DAmupkf
https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
iTunes, Google Play Music, RSS, Spotify, YouTube

Episode 26 – How Lea Bickerton Is Helping Registrants

We are graciously joined by Lea Bickerton. Who is a practicing attorney in the Pittsburgh, Western Pennsylvania area @ Bickerton & Bickerton Attorneys at Law. While doing research for tonight, I discovered that you’re a multiple-time recipient of the Rising Stars award from Super Laywers.com. We’re very fortunate to have you joining us tonight 🙂
@bickertonlaw on Twitter https://twitter.com/bickertonlaw