SWs

Point on extra-judicial restrictions needs tweeking. The Whetterling Act in 94OMNIBUS unconstitutionally recognised a third extra-jurisdictional awareness of local governments. The third party is blatantly outside of the TWO levels: Federal Or State mandated in black and white under the establishment clauses.

St. Peter saw right passed that pillow.

They do this just because they can. And about abusing a child over and over again, what about the feds looking at CP pictures and posting them on entrapment web sites?

The government will gladly remove your rights if you give them permission. Citizens with rights are an obstacle to progress of government. Popular laws pass because of fear and revenge. The government cannot wait for us to ask for more unconstitutional laws. There has to be a price for this injustice that is undesirable for there to be change sadly it will have to be high. Don’t worry though if they continue on the road they are on it will happen one day i’m certain of it. Imagine the suffering of the pariahs on the registry not everyone on the registry was guilty of a crime imagine what horrors are tumbling around in those guys minds. Society needs to fear them.

I wounder if the same evidence is required to call someone something without defamation of character as it is to convict them of it since they are taking someone word above another to do so. You cannot just say someone is something without proof right? Sue them sue them until they don’t want to play anymore f-ing lairs that they are.

You must receive fair notice that something is illegal for you to be prosecuted for it. Fair notice has to be written in the state codes this is one of the reasons they are getting sued for passing laws beyond the state code. If it is not in the federal or State code one could ignore it knowing that they would eventually win if they got a lawyer to use the fair notice argument. The only draw back to this is in this country we punish people before they are found guilty buy putting them in jail and requiring them to pay money to get out discriminating against the poor in the process. If you just assume everything the government is doing is one big lie and unconstitutional you will be right more then 50% of the time now days.

I Agree Jack and every since the federal court admitted it was punishment. it is a Double Jeopardy violation among other rights, an actual part of peoples constitutional rights that they are violating every day after. They are acting like this did decision did not change anything because they can. The People in charge are worse then the majority of the people they punish.

I totally agree. How can you be accused of child abuse when there was never even a child present. I wonder if you can sexually abuse a picture. Not to mention if your looking at adult porno, which is totally legal, why all of a sudden do pictures of children start showing up on the screen? I’ll tell you why because you’re being set up. It’s all about money nothing else. The government is so greedy they’ll do anything to get money. It has nothing to do with protecting the children or they would be more concerned with the people that are posting the pictures. They go after the little guys instead of addressing the real problem they’re much easier to get. It’s easy money to them.

I totally agree with your comment . I agree there should be reclassification of registrants. People who view porn have different minds than those of violent offenders . No harm to anyone is intended . I know a guy who stumbled on child porn while viewing adult porn and he now is branded for life ! Have known him all his life and would never hurt a fly . They throw everyone into one pot and call it quits -so unfair to many !