Allie,

I am merely a user of this podcast, but you post makes great points.

The Sistine chapel itself contain glorious images of nakedness all considered art. My only experience with child pornography came in the hands of the Wisconsin, DOC. I agreed to their test in an effort to prove my innocence. DOC exposed me to pictures of children, nude and measured my arousals with a device. The process was shameful and disgusting to me, I cannot describe how I felt in words, but it was not excited. I had to prove to them that I was not the one, so I did it. They tried to confront me about the results, but I demanded they display the inputs and outputs simultaneously for the group to see. They refused to put it into the open and I know why! Safe to say that’s the only place I’ve seen pictures of naked humans age 4 to 16. OK aside from the old pictures parents used to take of 1 yr old naked and grinning on a blanket. Maybe those types of pictures would fall under CP stats today.

Let me turn to your statement about your husband being older by 5 years. In this state, WI, he would be. Statutory limits difference to 4 years. Our state would prosecute if they had knowledge. Our state sets adulthood by stat too, it is 18yoa. Yet that distinction is waived if a child commits a crime ( esp black or Hispthat youth) even as young as 9 yoa.

So the people complain that adult citizens are treating minor citizens like adults, yea we follow our leadership. There are a good many, “obscene” behavior occurring in our country some of the most by our leadership. It is one thing to assault and individual; and quite another to assault a mass of individuals.

Bless you & your family.

Tim L.

BTW before Lagoon, Brook did Pretty Women, she was 11! In that film she was purchase by a man for $ 400.00 in a New Orleans brothel auction. Her virginity was advertised at sale. That’s Hollywood for ya.

Andy’s,

I appreciate your reply. Misinformation is a key aspect of propaganda. America has been grossly manipulated with respect to the intent of the state’s SOR. While registration has been deemed civil, clearly residence restrictions closely resemble banishment & or exile and thereby are not intended to be civil. SOR is a sword used to cut certain aspects of liberty out of registrant’s lives. Registration is indenture by definition despite its misnaming by professional liars. Data demanded is a commodity. The uses derived from the machine’s existence may provide some semblance of safety but it is unquantifiable. To put it more simply, the needs of the machine do not by natural law out weigh the needs of humans to be part of a society.

Furthermore, indentured servitude according to the 13th is only permitted as punishment for a crime. Here Mr. Roberts convinced the highest court that registration itself imposed no affirmative disability, yet today that distortion (more precisely minimization) is plain on its face indenture. An indenture used to impose disability and restraint upon those already convicted. In effect directly imposing onerous obligations that inevitably force registrants back into DOC systems and sometimes imposing further incarceration or P&P, depending on how dangerous they deem you, based on the original case. My point being that the people’s intent with the SORs is now quite obvious.

As I have noted on previous posts, a database is a powerful tool. The two parties are engaged in unconstitutional uses of these databases and not just to protect citizenry. They are utilizing the databases to protect their political security. The two parties have fleeced the people of their money, their property and their liberty. 20 trillion and counting and that number does not in anyway reflect the debt owed by the states to some by way of pension obligations that are uncounted in budgets.

To end my post:
Alexa please tell me Andy’s: Whole name, SSI#, marital status, address, his parent’s and sibling’s addresses, his annual salary, driver’s license #, his school transcript, social groups participated in, known friends and associates. Please Alexa include any biometric data on Andys you can compile.

I understand your point in who that institution is. However, the only point behind the article was to point out the crazy stance on someone with this issue. It’s totally crazy to bring up that this is a thing

A bit of research on the Baxter Bulletin reveals their ownership by Gannett Company inc. This fact is problematic as Gannet only wants to sell papers. Thereof their motivations are not grounded in public safety. It is safe to say that Gannett cannot wait for the next sex story or school shooting to occur as it bolsters their bottom line. We have free press in America and Gannett can and will continue to exploit the issue for their profit. If no sex assault or school shooters were in play they would likely go bankrupt in this electronic age. In short Gannett knowingly and purposely promotes yellow journalism.

I sure do appreciate your podcasts, but avoiding stories provided by the Gannett group would be appreciated as they have no real interest in protecting anyone. Furthermore, by promoting if you will, Gannett stories on this podcasts you do us a disfavour.