Comments on: Episode 14 – Will Judges Save Us From Ourselves? https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/episode-14-will-judges-save-us-from-ourselves/ A legal and policy podcast about the sex offender registry Sat, 10 Mar 2018 02:31:09 +0000 hourly 1 By: Saddles https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/episode-14-will-judges-save-us-from-ourselves/#comment-44 Sat, 10 Mar 2018 02:31:09 +0000 http://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&p=160#comment-44 Yes at times I like listening to Larry & Andy to get their view’s of all this sex registry ordeal. While I’m sure all have opinions about this I and I’m sure the average person can get a lot of info out of all this but listening is the key elements in these encounters. Internal evidence is a good factor they tend to use when presenting these cases. but actual intent who can determine that? Sure if one has a “real” victim than its sort of a touch and go issue.
Today its a bit tough with so much confusion but it really shouldn’t be. Of course there is always going to be crime , but today we have this internet issue and that is a tool they “police” use in these situations that go against the way policing was intended to be as opposed to the earlier years back before the internet.
Yes we have people in every walks of life getting ensnared in all this internet issue which I believe should be in a separate category by itself but sin is sin if you would like to call it that at least that’s what the bible says. Man has always wanted to be right to dominate others. I couldn’t serve two masters. I still say Judge not or you’ll be judged.
Decisions always come into play in any opportunity. Being bias against certain sex offender issues is a part of human nature and is totally wrong. Humbling is a lot better and forgiving but in the long run man wants to be right in all aspects but facts and due process do need to play a lot of issues when any ordeal is upon court of law or justice is not being served and nobody win’s. Its all about money and States want to overthrow those that appears to disprspect the law.
There is a difference in respecting and disrespecting just like there is difference in telling a lie and deceiving or making a choice or a decision.Maybe we should have a law of duping someone in cases of deceptive sexual internet sting operations. These unfair challanges with a plea deal in these internet set-up encounters are very shakey. There is not a lot of balance in these issues when due process is swayed by a plea deal they offer. Actually Judges and PO’s are servants and they are not going to save you. The truth must come out in these ordeals or where is due process down the drain.

]]> By: Tim https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/episode-14-will-judges-save-us-from-ourselves/#comment-43 Fri, 09 Mar 2018 20:30:07 +0000 http://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&p=160#comment-43 Will judges save us from lawmakers?

Madison v Marbury1803: Judicial review establishment = A panel may void an act.
That one may have opportunities does not equate to will do. We call this judicial restraint, presuming congress is of constitutional construction in law making. Thus SCOTUS defaulted in review in Whetterling Acts case03. That court did not consider the real question the electronic indenture as a punishment. The point was not considered, or couched in those terms either in Alaska &Conn v doe03.

Registrants live under the general warrant condition. That is…… if a crime has occurred in your proximity you the sexual offender generally warrant a look by LEOs. If a child disappeared from a community all nearby registrants will be interviewed whether they are ACTUALLY involved is irrelevant. Some waste is apparent since no public interest is served from extraneous information gleaned from a fruitless interviews.

]]>