Comments on: Episode 9 – Who represents the victims?

By: andys

andys — Sun, 11 Feb 2018 00:04:24 +0000

In reply to SW.

Even if you, me, we can’t vote – that doesn’t mean we don’t have a voice and doesn’t mean that we can’t influence our friends and family to our way of thinking.

By: SW

SW — Sat, 10 Feb 2018 18:55:17 +0000

In reply to Steve. Most of us can't vote.

By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:32:07 +0000

In reply to John.

John- This IS my country. I don’t agree with every Federal or State law…so it’s up to me to vote, write my representatives, and try to move the laws to what I interpret as fair and just.
I have to do it…I can’t leave because people hate me, and because it’s hard- it’s harder for those who love me- and that’s why I have to stay and try to make the changes.
My Country, my State, my family, their future.

By: Timothy DA Lawver

Timothy DA Lawver — Fri, 02 Feb 2018 01:07:06 +0000

In reply to Timothy DA Lawver. Just to correct myself. I noted above, the Whetterling act changed all that. More correctly it was the SCOTUS ruling of the Whetterling Act that solidified the constitutional use of indenturement, ex-post by states. Keep in mind since then all Americans are having their biometric data collected and stored by both government, private individuals and corporations.

By: Timothy DA Lawver

Timothy DA Lawver — Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:31:06 +0000

I listen but you two men miss the point!
This whole deal is not about the sex offender or public safety.
IT IS ABOUT THE DATABASE!
In particular, it came about when the powers that be realized the power AND USES of the machine to effect POLITICAL SECURITY.

Consider, the deep state’s uses of databases. (See EFF.Org)
While foreign surveillance is completely permissible, domestic electronic surveillance WAS a no-no.
The Wetterling Act changed that.

Think about it gentlemen, If a state may indenture an individual to a machine {SOR DATABASE} then the government may indeed monitor the people with it too!

With respect to individual liberty the most severe punishment is incarceration, registration as it currently exists, is a close second, because telling a man he may go where he wants but he may not proves the same result.

By: Tim

Tim — Thu, 01 Feb 2018 22:16:29 +0000

In reply to John. what county did you move too?

By: Tammie Leigh Lawson

Tammie Leigh Lawson — Thu, 01 Feb 2018 05:05:30 +0000

I want to ask Why can’t the Sex Offender Registry have reclassification for offenders with a certain criteria of offenses? There are thousands of people on a Violent Sex Offender Registry where no violence ever took place even some where no child was involved with the offender at all. How can a person be classified as a Violent Offender when there was no violent act and no child was touched by the offender? How did this happen? What kinda system puts this hardship on a person let alone his or her family. Lifetime restrictions!!! Somewhere the system is broken and failed! Reform is needed!!!!

By: John

John — Thu, 01 Feb 2018 03:58:35 +0000

Just leave the country, sex offenders have no rights, murderers have more rights!
You be surprise how your life is much better and your back to leaving a normal life when you leave this country and the police state you live in.

By: David Brown

David Brown — Wed, 31 Jan 2018 18:35:51 +0000

If you keep people out of the above ground economy you will force them back into the underground economy. It isn’t about caring about the rights of those who have committed crimes. It’s about reducing further crime by letting those who have committed crimes back into society after they have done their time. Statistically, former sex offenders have the lowest recidivism rates.