<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: RM272: Wisconsin Supreme Court Determined The Meaning Of &#8220;Separate Occasions&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm272-wisconsin-supreme-court-determined-the-meaning-of-separate-occasions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm272-wisconsin-supreme-court-determined-the-meaning-of-separate-occasions/</link>
	<description>A legal and policy podcast about the sex offender registry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2026 01:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Pissed off anon		</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm272-wisconsin-supreme-court-determined-the-meaning-of-separate-occasions/#comment-11326</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pissed off anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 13:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=3502#comment-11326</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah it’s funny how the DOC urged the legislature to rewrite the law bc this was going to affect their free cash gusher, so instead of looking at why, they made it look like the Supreme Court created a loophole, when really they were just undoing what Brad Schimmel did. Of course the DOC is going to request things that are in there best interest, but the way they keep going about it, circumventing the courts is just wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it’s funny how the DOC urged the legislature to rewrite the law bc this was going to affect their free cash gusher, so instead of looking at why, they made it look like the Supreme Court created a loophole, when really they were just undoing what Brad Schimmel did. Of course the DOC is going to request things that are in there best interest, but the way they keep going about it, circumventing the courts is just wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DT		</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm272-wisconsin-supreme-court-determined-the-meaning-of-separate-occasions/#comment-11171</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 14:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=3502#comment-11171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m devastated by this action having been rewritten by Governor Evers. The Supreme Court ruled, my registry date went back to it&#039;s originally intended end and then they just rewrote the law and it&#039;s back to L-I-F-E. I sure hope people are fighting the good fight.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m devastated by this action having been rewritten by Governor Evers. The Supreme Court ruled, my registry date went back to it&#8217;s originally intended end and then they just rewrote the law and it&#8217;s back to L-I-F-E. I sure hope people are fighting the good fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
