Comments on: RM71: Illinois Rules On Sex Offenders Unconstitutional

By: James Coghill

James Coghill — Fri, 12 Apr 2019 02:25:43 +0000

“I don’t know that he didn’t have sex.” That’s true in every sex offense case that didn’t happen in public with witnesses.

By: WC_TN

WC_TN — Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:39:42 +0000

In reply to WC_TN. I had heard of this conundrum while doing time, I think. That is where I heard that now that I think of it...in prison and you know how a rumor mill churns in prison.

By: WC_TN

WC_TN — Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:38:10 +0000

Once off supervision, interstate travel is deemed a very strong right. At least that’s what I have read in times past.

By: andys

andys — Tue, 09 Apr 2019 17:06:21 +0000

In reply to WC_TN.

I don’t think that can be a thing. Off of supervision, you can go where you want – right?
Then depending on the state, you have to follow their rules.

By: WC_TN

WC_TN — Tue, 09 Apr 2019 16:59:49 +0000

Have you ever heard of a situation where a registrant (NOT ON ANY OTHER SUPERVISION OF ANY KIND) has wanted to move to another state and was told by the destination state that if they didn’t have a job or family already in that state that they won’t allow you to move there?

It seems I read somewhere years ago that states are reluctant to let registered citizens to just move in unless they are moving to come to a job or if they have family in the state. If they’re just wanting to move for the sake of moving, I’ve heard they have been turned down.