Comments on: RM77: MA High Court Rules to Release Registrant

By: Brian Stickler

Brian Stickler — Sun, 26 May 2019 08:53:57 +0000

I am a tier 1 (misdemeanor) sex registrant in California for 4 years, If I move to Idaho, and register, will I be a tier 1 offender there? If yes, then do I have to stay on the registry there for 10 years, or will the 4 years I have been on it in California count, so that I could petition to be removed after 6 more years?

By: David Higham

David Higham — Sun, 26 May 2019 01:29:01 +0000

In reply to CJ. CJ, I totally agree with you on the issue of the aclu I love in Rhode island and have asked them for help in challenging sorna about the constitutionally of it after Muniz vs commonwealth of Pennsylvania where the supreme court ruled it unconstitutional but was told by the Cali of Rhode island that they do not defend privacy issues so for that reason I do not support my local office of the aclu do as far as I am concerned the aclu Is wasted space in ri they have private attorneys who donate there time also called pro bono if these lawyers were to help so many people in fighting these ridiculous then we may get some place. wasted

By: CJ

CJ — Tue, 21 May 2019 17:14:55 +0000

Enjoy listening. Informative and thought-provoking.

You commented on ACLU membership in this episode (#77); I am a registrant, and also support the ACLU, but not because they have ever done anything that I’m aware of for our specific issues. I realized a long time ago after asking them for assistance a couple of times that sex offender issues simply were not “sexy” enough for the ACLU to tackle. I still support them however, especially with a president who is such a blatant self-serving parasite who corrupts everything and everyone around him. We need the ACLU and similar organizations to help keep check on government that can and will run amok at every opportunity. I also support NARSOL, FWIW, in hopes that the registries can be abolished within my lifetime.