<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: RM87: Stupid, but Constitutional	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm87-stupid-but-constitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm87-stupid-but-constitutional/</link>
	<description>A legal and policy podcast about the sex offender registry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 17:20:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: andys		</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm87-stupid-but-constitutional/#comment-284</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 17:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=784#comment-284</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm87-stupid-but-constitutional/#comment-283&quot;&gt;Randall Stephens&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey Randall,
I should have been more clear in my comments. There are those that practice chiropractic care that then throw in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/answering-our-critics-again/
The reason for the rant about pseudoscience comes up in regards to the polygraph. It works because you believe it works, which is therefore placebo.
When I read articles about a chiropractor doing spinal subluxation on an infant, written by a Medical Doctor, https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/chiropractic-vertebral-subluxations-science-vs-pseudoscience/ it is scary to me]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm87-stupid-but-constitutional/#comment-283">Randall Stephens</a>.</p>
<p>Hey Randall,<br />
I should have been more clear in my comments. There are those that practice chiropractic care that then throw in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).<br />
<a href="https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/answering-our-critics-again/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/answering-our-critics-again/</a><br />
The reason for the rant about pseudoscience comes up in regards to the polygraph. It works because you believe it works, which is therefore placebo.<br />
When I read articles about a chiropractor doing spinal subluxation on an infant, written by a Medical Doctor, <a href="https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/chiropractic-vertebral-subluxations-science-vs-pseudoscience/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/chiropractic-vertebral-subluxations-science-vs-pseudoscience/</a> it is scary to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randall Stephens		</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm87-stupid-but-constitutional/#comment-283</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall Stephens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 11:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=784#comment-283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Enjoyed your podcast, especially the stories that actually involve registry &quot;matters&quot;. Ever listen to someone not informed on the very low recidivism of SO&#039;s speak on the &quot;alarmingly high&quot; recidivism makes me cringe. Kind of like listening to someones comments on chiropractic who is uninformed. After practicing the profession for over 20 years I had to cringe while listening. Stay on topics you know something about, &quot;registry matters&quot;. What your not up on, your down on. Enuf said. 

I do appreciate your efforts!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed your podcast, especially the stories that actually involve registry &#8220;matters&#8221;. Ever listen to someone not informed on the very low recidivism of SO&#8217;s speak on the &#8220;alarmingly high&#8221; recidivism makes me cringe. Kind of like listening to someones comments on chiropractic who is uninformed. After practicing the profession for over 20 years I had to cringe while listening. Stay on topics you know something about, &#8220;registry matters&#8221;. What your not up on, your down on. Enuf said. </p>
<p>I do appreciate your efforts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
