<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PrivatePrisons Archives - Registry Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.registrymatters.co/tag/privateprisons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/tag/privateprisons/</link>
	<description>A legal and policy podcast about the sex offender registry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2024 00:17:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>RM326: Attorney-Client Privilege: Proving Prejudice Is Key</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm326-attorney-client-privilege-proving-prejudice-is-key/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm326-attorney-client-privilege-proving-prejudice-is-key/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2024 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[6thAmendmentDiscussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AttorneyClientPrivilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConfidentialityInQuestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConstitutionalRights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreCivicIssues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CourtCasesExplained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HollandvsUnitedStates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LawAndJustice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LawTalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LegalDeepDive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LegalPrecedents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LegalRightToPrivacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LegalUpdates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PrivatePrisons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProsecutionvsDefence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProsecutorMisconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RegistryMattersPodcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SchillingervsHaworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StructuralErrorInLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UnderstandingTheLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US10thCircuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USLawInsights]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4023</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>[5:15] The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit has overturned a 30-year precedent, ruling that a violation of the right to confidential attorney-client calls arises only if a defendant shows that there was realistic potential for the prosecution to benefit from listening to communication. Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477 Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com Support us on [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm326-attorney-client-privilege-proving-prejudice-is-key/">RM326: Attorney-Client Privilege: Proving Prejudice Is Key</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm326-attorney-client-privilege-proving-prejudice-is-key/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/rm326-attorney-client-privilege-proving-prejudice-is-key.mp3" length="27416294" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
