We are the ones that give them the power to use information.
My problem with your argument is you refer to this all as one database. You call it ‘the database’ This isn’t ‘the database’.
These are records held by the phone companies for their purpose. The government didn’t hack into it, or have a back door to the data.
They didn’t quite get a search warrant for it either though. There was a small barrier to getting it.
Thankfully SCOTUS is seeing the incredible leak of data that our cell phones give off and are moving in the direction that it’s more than a PDA

Andy,
I hope this hyperlink works. It should take you to this ruling in US v Carpenter.
Here we see LAW ENFORCEMENT utilizing a database information in an unconscionable manner. This case specifically deals with location information from cell phone use. The king’s henchmen have always adored unreasonable S&,S. The exploitation of database information in this situation was used to make cases LEO couldn’t make without the warrantless search. This is exactly how they (LEOs) love to make themselves appear effective, when in reality they are violating the law. They hate limits precisely because it makes it more difficult to protect and serve, or as they often claim to protect the public.
Will we abandon the database? Likely not. But there must be a limit on how far government agents may go. IMHO LEO often exceeds the limit concerning databases and apologize later. Here their behaviour was defended all the way to SCOTUS, just like SOR; with a much different outcome.

SOR was upheld as was civil commitment, but in the long run, both policies will be found in error because the outcomes are more or less fruitless misadventure.

Ok, so let’s go from the standpoint that there is a database.
You are on camera most of the day at convenience stores, atm cameras, stoplight cameras
You internet usage is profiles by the Googles, etc. of the world.
Police wear body cams, or have cameras in their vehicles.
The surveillance has been increase with every increase in technology, or reduction in the cost of the technology.
None of this has anything to do w/ the registry though.

And here you are, all tin-foil hat screaming about ‘the database’ when the population of the world is under surveillance.
But your IP never changes. You’re using an email address that is w/ one of the big ISPs who is at least capable of watching your traffic more so than any of the Googles et al.

So why aren’t you using something like TAILS, or TOR Browser.

It would seem if you’re going to go on and on ‘about the database’ that you would make efforts to leave as little of a digital signature as you can.

You don’t give links to places, making it hard to track down what you’re trying to say
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/06/hart-homeland-securitys-massive-new-database-will-include-face-recognition-dna-and

You talked aboutthe Me 2 movement which I could care less about. If thats the case we could talk about who was biting or enticed by the serpent and not a pink elephant. You talked about some crafting a different message. Well sex is no different than if one were in Rome but todays courts want a quick and easy solution but I never heard any why or how to fix all this yet or any proof or true meaning to all this.

I was impressed by the “mob law rule” as you guys call it that seems to be against those that do these sex crimes. And yes women are very against things. Its like a slam, bamn, thank you ma’am and I’m gonna get ya sucker for doing this to me because I’m a women. I wonder who enticed Adam to eat the fruit than? Why did they eat the fruit, to make them wise. Ok Sandy study to show thyself approved.

Now I know I have been knocked down a bit, on NARSOL forum, with my rightous talk but there is a difference between righteous and religon and there is also a difference between enabler and enabling. Sure when some of most were in those AA meetings we talked about enabling and I really didn’t tbink of it that way to use it in this sex offender situation. Something to ponder on.
Now I’m sure Paul Dubbling was informative as you and andy are on this podcast, taking notes and listening is very important for all that tune in. Now you guys are doing a great job believe or not and Larry is still seeking a message. Here’s one divent prevention in sex laws and enviornment pursuasion, prevent, methods to help in changing this cricis of the sex offender and the hardships families members go thru with real truth about todays’ society and laws.

Keep up the good work guys as you are really helping others that go thru all this worry by informing and conforting others.

Has Mr. Schumer not just authorized the public’s use of FBI data base?
Facial recognition devices will now be widely used by private and public institutions.

Like a gun a database can and does get misused. The right to defend oneself from the collection of personal information itself is obvious, though some disavow the right to remain free of it by volition. Do you honestly believe Facebook is not misusing information? With SOR we see the extreme exploitation of the database with dubious results. Bad results clearly implicates the purely political INTENT of SOR (the electronic list) in the first place.
Do the people owe it to themselves to protect their kids…YES!
Are they to leave it to the STATE & FED?
Only if you’re nuts??

Andy be honest do you not think the State’s individual SORs were not intended to be as one? Their interconnected nature makes it the default condition.

That the people have opted for 50, instead of just one (1) is a product of what, efficiency, efficacy?…or was it just a bone for the unionized protection workers to get it voted for. After all Andy, you MUST placate both big biz and big labor to get anything done in D.C. That is a FACT!

Some knew there was cash to be made from big data long before it was understood by the public. One may not just own a database, one must have unfettered use to gain full effect. For registrants the goal is to remain free of it. They only get what you give them. I created a email just for them, because they asked!
I NEVER open the account lest they may start demanding I reply to their emails.

BTW.
In my most recent ” failure to provide” case 2011, I at trial posed the following question to the agent.

Maam, SOR form demands all email addresses correct?
A: Yes, they must provide all.
Under threat of felony if they do not correct?
A: yes, Up to 6 years.
Maam, Do SOR agents intend to contact registrants via email?
A:No, we currently do not contact or communicate with them by email.
Maam. The purpose of email is to communicate is it not?
A: yes ( shortened for brevity and over objection by state)

Ma’am SOR agents, via form, demand email address for purposes outside of their normal use?
A: I guess…
Ma’am can you tell the Jury then the actual purpose is?? If it not to communicate?
A: So it can be used, I think.

Ma’am for what our that is used how?