<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Registry Matters Archives - Registry Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.registrymatters.co/series/default-podcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/series/default-podcast/</link>
	<description>A legal and policy podcast about the sex offender registry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 03:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>RM383: Who&#8217;s Watching Every Car You Drive?</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm383-whos-watching-every-car-you-drive/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm383-whos-watching-every-car-you-drive/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Flock cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license plate surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFR policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registrant suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offense registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media ban]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4516</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: a registrant dies by suicide inside a treatment program, yet his family isn&#8217;t notified for eight months — a devastating failure of accountability we examine in detail. We also break down whether people pushed off social media by PFR policies have any real legal recourse against private platforms like Meta, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm383-whos-watching-every-car-you-drive/">RM383: Who&#8217;s Watching Every Car You Drive?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm383-whos-watching-every-car-you-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM382: Fingerprinted for Making an Email Account</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm382-fingerprinted-for-making-an-email-account/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm382-fingerprinted-for-making-an-email-account/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 03:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymous speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment restrictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet identifiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interstate compact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probation conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offense registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia registry law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4519</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: A bill that never became law is being enforced anyway — and registered people are paying the price for legislation that died in committee. We also dig into probation conditions so vaguely worded that officers can ban virtually any employment, the reality of transferring probation across state lines (hint: it&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm382-fingerprinted-for-making-an-email-account/">RM382: Fingerprinted for Making an Email Account</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm382-fingerprinted-for-making-an-email-account/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM381: Does a Conviction Erase Parental Rights?</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm381-does-a-conviction-erase-parental-rights/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm381-does-a-conviction-erase-parental-rights/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama residency restrictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania State Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry verification]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: Advocacy groups finally force Pennsylvania State Police to answer for eight years of ignoring a legally mandated telephone registry verification system. Plus, we examine the 11th Circuit&#8217;s en banc ruling that recognizes parental rights as fundamental while stopping short of striking down Alabama&#8217;s ban on registrants living with their own [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm381-does-a-conviction-erase-parental-rights/">RM381: Does a Conviction Erase Parental Rights?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm381-does-a-conviction-erase-parental-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/rm381-does-a-conviction-erase-parental-rights.mp3" length="37922480" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM380: SCOTUS Limits Police Phone Tracking</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm380-scotus-limits-police-phone-tracking/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm380-scotus-limits-police-phone-tracking/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 10:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA["Florida registrant restrictions"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["free speech"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["geofence warrants"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Louisiana incarceration"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["police phone tracking"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["registry laws"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: Florida has passed a law making it illegal for registrants to speak to minors in public, raising alarming First Amendment free speech questions. Then, a Louisiana man spent 179 days in jail over charges that were ultimately dropped, exposing how registry and probation systems can inflict devastating errors with zero [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm380-scotus-limits-police-phone-tracking/">RM380: SCOTUS Limits Police Phone Tracking</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm380-scotus-limits-police-phone-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/rm380-scotus-limits-police-phone-tracking.mp3" length="39211937" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM379: Where You Did It Is Where They Try You</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm379-where-you-did-it-is-where-they-try-you/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm379-where-you-did-it-is-where-they-try-you/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[federal jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interstate compact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-state supervision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offense registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state of conviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court venue ruling]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: The Supreme Court hands down a unanimous venue ruling that could have far-reaching implications for federal jurisdiction over registry-related prosecutions. Then, Larry and Andy untangle the confusing web of multi-state supervision — explaining which state controls your sentence and which state controls your registration requirements, and why the answer matters [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm379-where-you-did-it-is-where-they-try-you/">RM379: Where You Did It Is Where They Try You</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm379-where-you-did-it-is-where-they-try-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/rm379-where-you-did-it-is-where-they-try-you.mp3" length="33844200" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM378: Prosecuted for Trying to Stay Compliant</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm378-prosecuted-for-trying-to-stay-compliant/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm378-prosecuted-for-trying-to-stay-compliant/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Michigan Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parole officer complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parole supervision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registrant compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retroactive relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offender registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional registry law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacated convictions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4490</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: A Michigan Supreme Court ruling forces the state to vacate convictions under an unconstitutional registry law, offering hope to registrants who were prosecuted for trying to stay compliant. Plus, we explore whether requesting a new parole officer is a realistic option — and why filing official complaints can often make [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm378-prosecuted-for-trying-to-stay-compliant/">RM378: Prosecuted for Trying to Stay Compliant</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm378-prosecuted-for-trying-to-stay-compliant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/rm378-prosecuted-for-trying-to-stay-compliant.mp3" length="33037883" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM377: Why Innocent People Plead Guilty</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm377-why-innocent-people-plead-guilty/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm377-why-innocent-people-plead-guilty/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 10:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[criminal justice reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plea bargains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registered parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school exclusion zones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offender registry]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4484</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: We explore why innocent people plead guilty and how plea bargains, while providing certainty for all parties, require proper judicial oversight to ensure fundamental fairness. Plus, we discuss the challenges registered parents face when banned from their own children&#8217;s school campuses, and the practical accommodations they can propose like Zoom [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm377-why-innocent-people-plead-guilty/">RM377: Why Innocent People Plead Guilty</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm377-why-innocent-people-plead-guilty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/rm377-why-innocent-people-plead-guilty.mp3" length="72181710" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM376: Can You End Lifetime Supervision Early?</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm376-can-you-end-lifetime-supervision-early/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm376-can-you-end-lifetime-supervision-early/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[compelled speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment barriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifetime supervision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SORNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4479</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: New Mexico authorities face scrutiny for enforcing registration laws that don&#8217;t actually apply to a registrant, plus we examine whether Missouri&#8217;s blanket travel notification requirement constitutes unconstitutionally broad compelled speech. We also hear the sobering story of a registered person who submitted 700 job applications without a single hire, and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm376-can-you-end-lifetime-supervision-early/">RM376: Can You End Lifetime Supervision Early?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm376-can-you-end-lifetime-supervision-early/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/rm376-can-you-end-lifetime-supervision-early.mp3" length="39798785" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM375: Why Courts Refuse to Call Registration Punishment</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm375-why-courts-refuse-to-call-registration-punishment/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm375-why-courts-refuse-to-call-registration-punishment/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado SVP designation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eighth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan employment ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry as punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offender registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vagueness doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth-serving businesses]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4474</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: We examine a Colorado Supreme Court ruling that upheld the sexually violent predator designation as non-punitive under the Eighth Amendment, exploring why courts continue to refuse calling registration punishment. We also dig into Michigan&#8217;s sweeping employment ban that would prohibit all 45,000 registrants from working in youth-serving businesses, and the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm375-why-courts-refuse-to-call-registration-punishment/">RM375: Why Courts Refuse to Call Registration Punishment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm375-why-courts-refuse-to-call-registration-punishment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/rm375-why-courts-refuse-to-call-registration-punishment-1.mp3" length="38317837" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM374: 45 Years Locked Up for What He Might Do</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm374-45-years-locked-up-for-what-he-might-do/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm374-45-years-locked-up-for-what-he-might-do/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[civil commitment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political backlash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offense registry]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4465</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: A federal court finds that Illinois&#8217;s civil commitment program violates due process by warehousing people for up to 45 years without adequate treatment. Plus, we explore the paradox of legal challenges to registry regulations — when winning in court can trigger political backlash that produces even harsher laws. Show Notes [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm374-45-years-locked-up-for-what-he-might-do/">RM374: 45 Years Locked Up for What He Might Do</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm374-45-years-locked-up-for-what-he-might-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/rm374-45-years-locked-up-for-what-he-might-do-1.mp3" length="35821205" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
