<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Registry Matters Archives - Registry Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.registrymatters.co/series/default-podcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/series/default-podcast/</link>
	<description>A legal and policy podcast about the sex offender registry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 14:04:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>RM388: Michigan Just Erased Its Pre-2011 Registry</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm388-michigan-just-erased-its-pre-2011-registry/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm388-michigan-just-erased-its-pre-2011-registry/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[acquittal registration requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ex post facto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan sex offender registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota predatory offender registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retroactive registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SORA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4533</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: Michigan&#8217;s Supreme Court ruled that retroactive sex offense registration is unconstitutional punishment, immediately erasing the pre-2011 registry and removing thousands of people from it. We break down what the decision means, who it covers, and how quickly relief actually reaches registrants on the ground. Then we turn to Minnesota, where [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm388-michigan-just-erased-its-pre-2011-registry/">RM388: Michigan Just Erased Its Pre-2011 Registry</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm388-michigan-just-erased-its-pre-2011-registry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/rm388-michigan-just-erased-its-pre-2011-registry.mp3" length="42864830" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM387: Seventh Circuit Guts an AI CSAM Charge</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm387-seventh-circuit-guts-an-ai-csam-charge/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm387-seventh-circuit-guts-an-ai-csam-charge/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI-generated CSAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal defense appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seventh Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offense registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vetting lawmakers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: the Seventh Circuit gutted an AI-generated CSAM possession count after the government conceded that no real child was depicted — a ruling with major implications for how prosecutors charge synthetic imagery cases. We also walk through a practical framework for vetting a lawmaker before you approach them, judging legislators by [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm387-seventh-circuit-guts-an-ai-csam-charge/">RM387: Seventh Circuit Guts an AI CSAM Charge</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm387-seventh-circuit-guts-an-ai-csam-charge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/rm387-seventh-circuit-guts-an-ai-csam-charge.mp3" length="46381025" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM386: Tier 2 Forever: A Registry Trap</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm386-tier-2-forever-a-registry-trap/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm386-tier-2-forever-a-registry-trap/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[mandatory treatment programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina registry law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registrant rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offender registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheriff lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tier classification]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: we dig into how mandatory sex offense treatment has drifted from therapy into a profitable surveillance and revenue operation — a class you pay for that keeps you monitored. Then a North Carolina church takes its own sheriff to court over whether a registered person can sit in a pew [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm386-tier-2-forever-a-registry-trap/">RM386: Tier 2 Forever: A Registry Trap</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm386-tier-2-forever-a-registry-trap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/rm386-tier-2-forever-a-registry-trap.mp3" length="35467755" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM385: Florida Sued: 98.9% of Housing Off-Limits</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm385-florida-sued-98-9-of-housing-off-limits/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm385-florida-sued-98-9-of-housing-off-limits/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign donations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida residency restrictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing restrictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offense registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional banishment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4522</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: Florida&#8217;s registry lawsuit finally has the expert evidence it needed — proof that 98.9% of the state&#8217;s housing is off-limits, turning residency restrictions into what amounts to unconstitutional statewide banishment. We also examine why political candidates so reliably return or refuse donations from people with sex offense convictions, and why [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm385-florida-sued-98-9-of-housing-off-limits/">RM385: Florida Sued: 98.9% of Housing Off-Limits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm385-florida-sued-98-9-of-housing-off-limits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM383: Who&#8217;s Watching Every Car You Drive?</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm383-whos-watching-every-car-you-drive/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm383-whos-watching-every-car-you-drive/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Flock cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license plate surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFR policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registrant suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offense registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media ban]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4516</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: a registrant dies by suicide inside a treatment program, yet his family isn&#8217;t notified for eight months — a devastating failure of accountability we examine in detail. We also break down whether people pushed off social media by PFR policies have any real legal recourse against private platforms like Meta, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm383-whos-watching-every-car-you-drive/">RM383: Who&#8217;s Watching Every Car You Drive?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm383-whos-watching-every-car-you-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM382: Fingerprinted for Making an Email Account</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm382-fingerprinted-for-making-an-email-account/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm382-fingerprinted-for-making-an-email-account/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 03:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymous speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment restrictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet identifiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interstate compact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probation conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offense registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia registry law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4519</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: A bill that never became law is being enforced anyway — and registered people are paying the price for legislation that died in committee. We also dig into probation conditions so vaguely worded that officers can ban virtually any employment, the reality of transferring probation across state lines (hint: it&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm382-fingerprinted-for-making-an-email-account/">RM382: Fingerprinted for Making an Email Account</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm382-fingerprinted-for-making-an-email-account/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM381: Does a Conviction Erase Parental Rights?</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm381-does-a-conviction-erase-parental-rights/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm381-does-a-conviction-erase-parental-rights/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama residency restrictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania State Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry verification]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: Advocacy groups finally force Pennsylvania State Police to answer for eight years of ignoring a legally mandated telephone registry verification system. Plus, we examine the 11th Circuit&#8217;s en banc ruling that recognizes parental rights as fundamental while stopping short of striking down Alabama&#8217;s ban on registrants living with their own [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm381-does-a-conviction-erase-parental-rights/">RM381: Does a Conviction Erase Parental Rights?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm381-does-a-conviction-erase-parental-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/rm381-does-a-conviction-erase-parental-rights.mp3" length="37922480" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM380: SCOTUS Limits Police Phone Tracking</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm380-scotus-limits-police-phone-tracking/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm380-scotus-limits-police-phone-tracking/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 10:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA["Florida registrant restrictions"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["free speech"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["geofence warrants"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Louisiana incarceration"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["police phone tracking"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["registry laws"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: Florida has passed a law making it illegal for registrants to speak to minors in public, raising alarming First Amendment free speech questions. Then, a Louisiana man spent 179 days in jail over charges that were ultimately dropped, exposing how registry and probation systems can inflict devastating errors with zero [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm380-scotus-limits-police-phone-tracking/">RM380: SCOTUS Limits Police Phone Tracking</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm380-scotus-limits-police-phone-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/rm380-scotus-limits-police-phone-tracking.mp3" length="39211937" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM379: Where You Did It Is Where They Try You</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm379-where-you-did-it-is-where-they-try-you/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm379-where-you-did-it-is-where-they-try-you/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[federal jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interstate compact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-state supervision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offense registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state of conviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court venue ruling]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: The Supreme Court hands down a unanimous venue ruling that could have far-reaching implications for federal jurisdiction over registry-related prosecutions. Then, Larry and Andy untangle the confusing web of multi-state supervision — explaining which state controls your sentence and which state controls your registration requirements, and why the answer matters [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm379-where-you-did-it-is-where-they-try-you/">RM379: Where You Did It Is Where They Try You</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm379-where-you-did-it-is-where-they-try-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/rm379-where-you-did-it-is-where-they-try-you.mp3" length="33844200" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RM378: Prosecuted for Trying to Stay Compliant</title>
		<link>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm378-prosecuted-for-trying-to-stay-compliant/</link>
					<comments>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm378-prosecuted-for-trying-to-stay-compliant/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Michigan Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parole officer complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parole supervision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registrant compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retroactive relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offender registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional registry law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacated convictions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.registrymatters.co/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=4490</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Registry Matters: A Michigan Supreme Court ruling forces the state to vacate convictions under an unconstitutional registry law, offering hope to registrants who were prosecuted for trying to stay compliant. Plus, we explore whether requesting a new parole officer is a realistic option — and why filing official complaints can often make [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm378-prosecuted-for-trying-to-stay-compliant/">RM378: Prosecuted for Trying to Stay Compliant</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.registrymatters.co">Registry Matters</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm378-prosecuted-for-trying-to-stay-compliant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/rm378-prosecuted-for-trying-to-stay-compliant.mp3" length="33037883" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
