RM170: “No Trick-or-Treating” Appellate Brief Filed

Remember the sheriff in Butts County, Georgia, Gary Long, that said “I’ll take this all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States if I have to”? Here we go with the next steps of the case. This is at the US Court of Appeals at the 6th Circuit. The case involves the First Amendment regarding compelled speech.

[5:53] Prosecutors asking for the names of all those removed from the registry in Hamilton County, Ohio

[15:29] Layman’s advice after convicted of sexual exploitation in New Mexico

[21:28] Fundraising using the registry to get contacts

[25:25] What does FYP and PFR mean?

[28:40] Registry removal after moving to a new state

[39:56] Appellate brief filed in Georgia against Butts County

 

Transcript of RM170: “No Trick-or-Treating” Appellate Brief Filed

https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm170-no-trick-or-treating-appellate-brief-filed/

Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477

Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com

Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters

Follow us on Twitter: Twitter

Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/UcpRtqq3At

Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters

iTunes, Google Play Music, RSS, Spotify, YouTube


RM169: No Legislating From the Bench in Wyoming – Textualism Explained

On this episode, we have one question from the free world and one from the inside. We have two letters. One was filled with “you people”‘s. It’s just for entertainment and doesn’t really have anything to do with our issue. We have we’re going to talk about a case out of the Wyoming Supreme Court that deals with PFRs. And we’re going to talk about Governor Cuomo. We’re going to talk about the fabulous work that that NARSOL just did with the filing of an amicus brief in the Supreme Court. We will never get to all this stuff.

[4:53] You People

[6:16] Do you people live in caves?

[13:41] Letter to a Colorado senator

[20:18] On pre trial status in the Western District of Texas

[24:57] Detailed question about language in a bill

[34:47] NARSOL Amicus brief

[42:50] Continued conversation about Cuomo

[50:08] Jeffrey Harrison versus the state of Wyoming

Read Transcript of RM169: No Legislating From the Bench in Wyoming – Textualism Explained

https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm169-no-legislating-from-the-bench-in-wyoming-textualism-explained/
Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Follow us on Twitter: Twitter
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/UcpRtqq3At
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
iTunes, Google Play Music, RSS, Spotify, YouTube

 


RM168: Court Says Community Safety Concerns Can’t Block Release

PA Court says FYP to PBPP (Pennsylvania Board of Pardons and Parole) that benefits PFRs

In episode 168, Larry gives us the analysis of a decision that comes from Pennsylvania and it’s great news for PFRs. The short version is individuals are being held past their awarded parole date simply because the community is uncomfortable with PFRs being released into their community. These people have been granted parole.

[4:15] Can the FBOP do anything they want to an inmate?

[13:15] The discrepancy of time given to PFR related crimes versus other crimes

[21:58] Followup discussion on contributing to advocacy organizations

[33:59] President Harry Truman and the constitution

[37:13] The Legislative Process

[42:12] Andrew Cuomo sexual harassment

[48:17] Police reform bill in the US Congress

[54:31] Lacey Stratfor et al versus John Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

 

Read Transcript RM168: Court Says Community Safety Concerns Can’t Block Release

 

RM168: Court Says Community Safety Concerns Can’t Block Release


Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Follow us on Twitter: Twitter
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/UcpRtqq3At
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
iTunes, Google Play Music, RSS, Spotify, YouTube


RM167: Hijacking A Bill With Floor Amendments

Welcome to episode 167 of Registry Matters. This episode discusses an interesting concept of a “Floor Amendment”. It was used when the bill passed from one chamber to the next, an amendment was added to it. Instead of the chamber simply passing it with no alterations, a vote was required. And then, since the bills don’t match, it has to go back to the chamber it started on. It’s a bit like legislative ping pong.

[3:52] In Michigan the new law removes many restrictions on where you can be present. What restrictions does it leave in place

[5:34] Do I need to tell my landlord or HOA about the registry

[14:50] Is it easier to change your supervised release address when still in federal prison or when I get out

[19:11] Where in writing does it state a federal prisoner can not be released to halfway house in Florida?

[31:59] Can you publish novels or similar work for money while incarcerated

[33:48] https://www.startribune.com/case-challenging-constitutionality-of-the-minnesota-sex-offender-program-can-move-forward/600027094/

[40:10] Hijacking a Bill

[1:02:53] Would the recent ruling in Tennessee mean I could file a challenge with this as guiding case law and force the state to dial my registration obligations back to what was in place on April 12, 2002

 

Read Transcript of RM167: Hijacking A Bill With Floor Amendments

RM167: Hijacking A Bill With Floor Amendments


Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Follow us on Twitter: Twitter
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/UcpRtqq3At
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
iTunes, Google Play Music, RSS, Spotify, YouTube

 


RM166: GA Legislature Debating Extending Registration Explained

This weeks episode of Registry Matters has us discussing in detail legislation from Georgia that has some very interesting language. This bill will allow some of those individuals on the registry to stay on for longer. This is amazing! Because that’s exactly what someone would want to do, which is stay on for longer. Even though there is no evidence that this would reduce the risk to the public. “Furthermore, there is also language that says Level II and III offenders are mostly all repeat offenders and they stay on the registry longer, anyway.”, District 14 State Rep. Mitchell Scoggins  (R, Cartersville) said. This is laughably false.

We had a multitude of questions as well. All in all, it was a really great episode!

[1:48] Note from attorney in the recent Tennessee case, covered on RM165: Huge Win In Tennessee Explained

[3:46] Ex-post-facto and Federal crimes

[8:20] Military convictions, Federal Bureau of Prisons, being released from prison

[13:12] So called probable cause hearings

[18:08] Convictions with “no evidence whatsoever”

[25:20] Romantic relationships: Can they prevent them? Yes. Conversation with Andres

[40:48] Georgia HR-347

[1:07:45] How does it feel to be finished with probation

 

Transcript of RM166: GA Legislature Debating Extending Registration Explained

 

https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm166-ga-legislature-debating-extending-registration-explained/
Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Follow us on Twitter: Twitter
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/UcpRtqq3At
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
iTunes, Google Play Music, RSS, Spotify, YouTube

 


RM165: Huge Win In Tennessee Explained

In this weeks episode, we explained the recent decision in United States District Court of the Middle District of Tennessee. The governor of Tennessee was William Haslam. He was the defendant along with the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation director. It was two separate but identical complaints filed by the same attorney. The two cases were consolidated for the purposes of case management discovery and pre-trial motions. This is a four four plus year old case. The state did what states do: they filed every motion they could think of, and they tried like hell to get out of this, but they didn’t get out of it. They failed because the landscape has changed a lot due to the ruling from the Sixth Circuit. Does versus Snyder, and Tennessee is in the Sixth Circuit which makes doe versus Snyder controlling case law.

We also went over some questions from listeners and readers. It was an excellent show that you don’t want to miss!

 

[2:22] Transferring to a new state post prison

[7:14] Changes to the Federal probation system / First Step Act

[13:42] Dual citizenship with The UK and renouncing citizenship your US citizenship
https://registranttag.org

[24:11] Covid and treatment and being released from prison

[31:00] Awesome Victory in Tennessee

 

Read Transcript of RM165: Huge Win In Tennessee Explained

 

https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm165-huge-win-in-tennessee-explained/
Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Follow us on Twitter: Twitter
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/UcpRtqq3At
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
iTunes, Google Play Music, RSS, Spotify, YouTube


RM164: Interstate Compact Revocation Hearings Explained

Today’s episode, we have more content that we can jam into an hour. We have three questions from behind the walls of prison. We have a couple questions from outside the walls of prison. And then we’re going to dig into interstate compact, probable cause hearings. And we’re gonna talk about the late Justice Scalia and his his philosophy about evolving about the evolution of the Constitution and why it does not evolve.

When transferring to another state, there are so many complicated rules and who has control of whom, it’s just crazy. it’s very difficult for a person forced to register. Once you go through all those hurdles, it’s really bad to get set back on some whimsical thing. There’s a special rule for for people who like to take notes, the interstate compact household bench book, and there’s rules rule 3.103-3 makes it difficult because the person is not allowed to go to the to the state, the receiving state, they’re not allowed to leave the sending state until the residence has been approved.

[2:09] Scalia and the changing of the Constitution

[11:38]Final talking points on stocks, short squeeze, Patreon Extra on GameSpot

[15:18] Are all those convicted of sexual offenses, “Violent Sex Offenders”

[19:54] Age of consent of victims

[27:56] Interview with Brenda Jones, Executive Director of NARSOL, suggestions for projects with those that are still incarcerated

[36:51] Interstate Compact, Probable Cause Hearings

 

Read Transcript of RM164: Interstate Compact Revocation Hearings Explained

https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm164-interstate-compact-revocation-hearings-explained/
Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Follow us on Twitter: Twitter
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/UcpRtqq3At
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
iTunes, Google Play Music, RSS, Spotify, YouTube


RM163: Can Minnesota Require Registration for Legal Conduct?

In RM163, we put together an exciting program discussing the options for someone with an out-of-state conviction. What paths are available to this individual to get off the registry. Stay put? Move back to where the conviction comes from? Another state entirely?

We also dig around the bill being proposed for a little while, and what strategy would be used to crash the bill.

[2:15] Letter from a listener

[5:48] What will the rules be after I get out of prison

[13:37] Why are prison sentences so different across different crimes

[20:04] Can Minnesota Require Registration for Legal Conduct?

[52:00] Legal strategy to kill a bill

 

Read Transcript of RM163: Can Minnesota Require Registration for Legal Conduct?

RM163: Can Minnesota Require Registration for Legal Conduct?


Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Follow us on Twitter: Twitter
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/UcpRtqq3At
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
iTunes, Google Play Music, RSS, Spotify, YouTube


RM162: Discussion on Challenging Legislation

Hello! And welcome to episode 162 of Registry Matters. We have several questions. And hopefully we can get to them all. We’re going to talk about a particular piece of legislation in the New Mexico State House Bill 56. And we’ve got some articles. One of our main focuses at Registry Matters is helping people become more informed about how to be effective advocates, and how this maze of rules and regulations impact them. So these questions are going to take priority and the legislative stuff that we’re going to talk.

[3:27] Interstate Compact question

[7:35] Probation and drug testing and employment success

[11:59] Chris sends a voicemail about 21 day notice of traveling to another state (not country)

[16:40] Will asks if the PFR community could buy enough shares of stock in FaceBook to force them to change their rules allowing us on their platform

[24:11] Challenging HB 56 in New Mexico

 

https://www.registrymatters.co/podcast/rm162-discussion-on-challenging-legislation/

Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477

Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com

Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters

Follow us on Twitter: Twitter

Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/UcpRtqq3At

Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters

iTunes, Google Play Music, RSS, Spotify, YouTube


RM161: Porn Ban Struck | Treatment Discussion w/ Theresa Robertson Ph.D., LCPC

Turns out, treatment could be counterproductive. We were joined this week by Theresa Robertson. A real live, in the flesh PhD and licensed psychotherapist in private practice. We first cover a few listener questions and then Theresa gives us a breakdown on subjective individuals to a one-size-fits-all model is not at all productive. And then Larry gives us the skinny on a decision from the 4th Circuit; another porn ban.

[1:49] Listener question

[9:54] Listener question

[19:26] Theresa Robertson theresa@parsol.org

[45:08] United States v. Ellis

[56:15] Introduction into bill analysis

[1:09:30] https://www.dailynews.com/2021/01/12/a-second-look-at-unjust-prison-terms/

[1:10:22] https://www.kansascity.com/news/coronavirus/article248381570.html

[1:13:55] https://wgxa.tv/news/local/perry-man-goes-to-prison-for-failing-to-report-cruise-ship-trip-registered-sex-offender

[1:17:38] https://www.newsweek.com/aclu-counsel-warns-unchecked-power-twitter-facebook-after-trump-suspension-1560248

Read Transcription of RM161: Porn Ban Struck | Treatment Discussion w/ Theresa Robertson Ph.D., LCPC

 

RM161: Porn Ban Struck | Treatment Discussion w/ Theresa Robertson Ph.D., LCPC


Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: registrymatterscast@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Follow us on Twitter: Twitter
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/UcpRtqq3At
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
iTunes, Google Play Music, RSS, Spotify, YouTube