All Episodes

The complete Registry Matters archive.

  • RM324: New York Registry Rules: No Credit for Time in Other States

    RM324: New York Registry Rules: No Credit for Time in Other States

    In this week’s episode, we’re diving into an intriguing case from the New York Court of Appeals. Plus, stick around for a sneak peek at an upcoming episode I’m working on all about international travel. Oh, and just a heads-up—no articles this time because, honestly, I’m keeping things short today. And no general rules for…

  • RM323: FL’s New PFR Law: What You Need to Know

    RM323: FL’s New PFR Law: What You Need to Know

    [3:25] In this segment, we explore Florida’s new PFR law, HB 1235. We break down the significant changes, discuss their implications for registrants, and examine the broader impact on civil rights and compliance. Join us for an in-depth conversation about the future of PFR laws in Florida and what these updates mean for everyone involved.…

  • RM321: When Judges Go Rogue: A Look at West Virginia’s Latest PFR Ruling

    RM321: When Judges Go Rogue: A Look at West Virginia’s Latest PFR Ruling

    In this episode, we dive into three thought-provoking cases highlighting issues within the justice and parole systems. First, Larry updates us on an 87-year-old man with dementia facing repeated charges despite being unfit for trial, underscoring judicial inefficiencies and the need for accountability. Next, we explore a West Virginia case where a man disputes his…

  • RM320: The Power of Our Vote in Justice Reform

    RM320: The Power of Our Vote in Justice Reform

    In this episode, we’ve got some good news to kick things off with a letter from Richard, which you can find in DropBox. I also want to dive into a PFR case I’ve been working on here in New Mexico. Plus, we’ve got a long segment lined up on the importance of knowing where candidates…

  • RM319: ‘Shall’ vs ‘May’: How Legal Language Shapes Justice

    RM319: ‘Shall’ vs ‘May’: How Legal Language Shapes Justice

    [3:15] We discuss the former Fox News host’s support for the Adam Walsh Act (AWA) and the irony surrounding his dismissal from the network over sexual harassment allegations. They transition into a broader discussion on marijuana legalization, noting the host’s misleading claims about Kamala Harris’s stance on forcing states to legalize marijuana. Larry draws a…

  • RM318: Missouri’s Halloween Sign Law Falls: A Major PFR Victory!

    RM318: Missouri’s Halloween Sign Law Falls: A Major PFR Victory!

    In this episode, we analyze a recent court decision from the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Missouri regarding a law requiring PFRs (people required to register) to post signs at their homes on Halloween stating “No candy or treats at this residence.” The plaintiff, Thomas L. Sanderson, challenged the statute, arguing…

  • RM317: The Truth About Probation Transfers: Breaking Down the Legal Maze

    RM317: The Truth About Probation Transfers: Breaking Down the Legal Maze

    In this episode, we explore various topics, starting with clips from Justice Antonin Scalia on strict interpretation and self-governance. They then tackle misleading statistics used by organizations like “Find the Children” to instill fear, highlighting the importance of critical thinking. The episode also delves into the significance of legislative elections in shaping criminal justice and…

  • RM316: People v. Malbry: Registry Relief Gets Tougher in California

    RM316: People v. Malbry: Registry Relief Gets Tougher in California

    In this episode, we’re diving into a pivotal legal update from the Second Appellate District in California. The recent case of People v. Malbry has sparked significant debate regarding sex offender registry petitions. We’ll explore how this decision, which upholds the denial of a petition from a convicted offender, may influence the petitioning process moving…

  • RM315: Illinois Court Ruling Brings Hope for Civil Commitment Reform

    RM315: Illinois Court Ruling Brings Hope for Civil Commitment Reform

    [6:24] We delve into the debate over the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, focusing on originalism versus a more dynamic, evolving approach. Larry introduces a classic clip from Justice Antonin Scalia, who argues that the Constitution should be interpreted as it was written over 200 years ago. The conversation explores how this viewpoint influences judicial…