Here’s episode 231, recorded on July 2, 2022. We cover a case called May versus Shinn. This is a very sad case from Arizona, involving burden shifting. May and his family are friends of the movement. We also cover a case from the 7th Circuit that affirms GPS monitoring for people no longer under supervision. They said it’s “OK”.
[13:33] May vs Shinn
[34:37] Braam, Antrim, Olszewski v Carr
Leave voicemail: 747-227-4477
Email us: firstname.lastname@example.org
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RegistryMatters
Join the Discord server: https://discord.gg/6FnxwAQm57
Want to support Registry Matters with some swag: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
Apple Podcasts: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/registry-matters/id1305039280
Google Play Music: https://play.google.com/music/listen?u=0#/ps/Icuxbpzvyti7wtoredipbtiojqy
One thought on “RM231: Seventh Circuit Affirms Post Supervision Lifetime GPS in Wisconsin”
I have a question…Braam is quoted as saying he pays $240/month for his GPS. And i’m pretty sure that’s the going rate here in the badger state. Why is that not an issue? Isn’t that a punitive amount to pay?
Thanks, as always, for the excellent service you provide!