In this first episode of April, we received a large amount of questions and voicemail; we cover a news item that shows strong support for people using or purchasing products that hire formerly incarcerated people; A man in Missouri soon to be executed requested a different method of execution, and SCOTUS denied it – the 8th Amendment doesn’t guarantee a painless death, but does prevent there from being a more painful death; And how inconsistent we are with providing a religious advisor at an execution based on different religions; Instead of revealing the software tools being used, prosecutors drop charges after being questioned; College student sentenced to 12 years in prison and he says he didn’t do it; Another shocker, Alabama prison has “Horrendously inadequate” medical treatment; Decision from Illinois where individuals are held past their release date, thus violating their constitutional rights.
[25:00] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47780123
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/02/opinions/supreme-court-cruel-death-row-ruling-filipovic/index.html
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/execution-texas-death-row-inmate-halted-over-buddhist-spiritual-adviser-n988741
[59:00] https://narsol.org/2019/04/federal-judge-continuing-incarceration-beyond-the-sentence-in-illinois-is-unconstitutional/
https://www.registrymatters.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Murphy_v_Raoul_2019_Illinois.pdf
Share the podcast with those you know so that we can continue to grow our audience! We continue to receive a lot of positive feedback. Help us grow!
https://www.Registrymatters.co/podcast/rm71-illinois-rules-on-sex-offenders-unconstitutional
747-227-4477
registrymatterscast@gmail.com
https://www.patreon.com/registrymatters
Discord server: https://discord.gg/DAmupkf
https://shop.spreadshirt.com/registry-matters
iTunes, Google Play Music, RSS, Spotify, YouTube
Have you ever heard of a situation where a registrant (NOT ON ANY OTHER SUPERVISION OF ANY KIND) has wanted to move to another state and was told by the destination state that if they didn’t have a job or family already in that state that they won’t allow you to move there?
It seems I read somewhere years ago that states are reluctant to let registered citizens to just move in unless they are moving to come to a job or if they have family in the state. If they’re just wanting to move for the sake of moving, I’ve heard they have been turned down.
I don’t think that can be a thing. Off of supervision, you can go where you want – right?
Then depending on the state, you have to follow their rules.
Once off supervision, interstate travel is deemed a very strong right. At least that’s what I have read in times past.
I had heard of this conundrum while doing time, I think. That is where I heard that now that I think of it…in prison and you know how a rumor mill churns in prison.
“I don’t know that he didn’t have sex.” That’s true in every sex offense case that didn’t happen in public with witnesses.